Caesar & Howie Latest News

Archive for the ‘General’ Category

Do It Yourself – at your peril.

Tuesday, August 17th, 2010

(Senior Partner Ivor Klayman of Caesar and Howie sounds a note of caution)

We live in austere times these days.  Money is tight in most households and we are all looking for ways to get things done cheaply if we can.  DIY stores are apparently bucking the retail trend for that very reason.  We are also seeing from time to time some legal work being done by individuals themselves.  This seems to be limited to probably two areas of work, letting residential property and writing wills.  On the letting side some people are reluctant landlords rather than landlords of choice – with letting being a last resort when the housing market is poor.  These landlords may be trying to let “on the cheap” On the wills side there has always been a small number of people who go “DIY”.

Sometimes a DIY legal job is done properly but over my career, for every well done DIY job I have seen, I have probably seen 10 times as many failures.  That’s a pretty horrible ratio and the consequences for the individuals and their families can be  damaging and expensive to fix – if they can be fixed.

Not setting up a Short Assured Tenancy properly can make it very difficult to recover the property from the tenant.   Not serving Notices to Quit properly can have the same effect and cause significant wasted court costs.  On top of that there is now a mass of legislation placing obligations on landlords, where if any obligations are not met, the consequences are potentially extremely serious.  So letting a house in Scotland without understanding the legal framework surrounding residential letting in Scotland is risky to say the least.

On the wills side I have seen “self made “wills which vary from being completely invalid to ones which were wholly confused and contradictory.   I have even seen a DIY will which did not actually leave the person’s property to anyone!

If legal documents are to have legal effect, experience of drafting such documents and of the meaning of legal terminology is really necessary to get things right.

I would never dream of rewiring my own house because I don’t have the skill and knowledge of an electrician (and anyway, it would now be illegal!).  I think DIY in critical areas is simply dangerous and usually a false economy.  In our field we generally earn higher fees sorting out an estate for example with a shambolic DIY will than we ever would from doing a correct will in the first place.

And one last point – all Scottish solicitors carry compulsory insurance against defective work.  If a solicitor does make a mistake clients can be and are compensated for losses occurring.  This is a massive protection for the Scottish public and really should make people think twice before perhaps dabbling in drafting legal documents which if wrongly completed could cost them or their family dear.

Ivor Klayman

Senior Partner

Caesar and Howie

Protecting the Vulnerable – Policing Powers of Attorney

Monday, July 26th, 2010

David Borrowman from Caesar and Howie discusses some of the issues brought up by clients considering granting Powers of Attorney.

Some clients worry about granting a Power of Attorney.  Sometimes a client will say “I wouldn’t trust X to look after my affairs properly.“  It is easy to deal with that – in such a case under no circumstances should X be appointed as an attorney.  There is no entitlement to be appointed someone’s attorney just because of a blood relationship.  So if clients have unreliable relatives they just should not appoint the relatives as attorneys.  The whole idea of appointing an attorney is to give powers to someone to act for your benefit and your benefit alone – consequently if a client has any doubts as to the integrity of the person to be appointed – the appointment should not be made.

Assuming a satisfactory person is found, clients can be reassured that person cannot simply do what he or she likes with the affairs of the incapacitated person. Attorneys are bound by a strict code of law laid down in the Adults with Incapacity Scotland Act.  Of course they should only act, at all, if the person who made them their attorney is for some reason (usually but not always illness) not capable of dealing with things himself or herself.  And when an attorney does act he or she must adhere to five principles laid down in the Act.  Simply put these are:  1. There must be no intervention unless for the benefit of the adult – “adult” being the name used for the incapacitated person in the Act.  2. Any intervention must be the least restrictive option in relation to the freedom of the adult.  3. Account must be taken of the present and past wishes of the adult.  4. Account must be taken of the views of others, eg the nearest relative or primary carer.  5. The attorney must encourage the adult to exercise whatever skills he or she has with respect to property etc.

In common sense terms being bound by these principles the attorney I suppose has to exercise his powers effectively acting in the way the adult would have acted had the adult not lost capacity.

Should an attorney breach the principles in the Act or act improperly then the Act does allow for robust sanctions.  The Public Guardian, the Mental Welfare Commission and Local Authorities and indeed any person claiming an interest in the affairs of that adult can apply to the court to safeguard the property, financial affairs or personal welfare of the adult.  The sheriff then has significant powers to resolve matters including placing that attorney under supervision of the Public Guardian, requiring accounts and reports to be submitted to court, even as far as revoking the appointment of the attorney.  On top of all that of course criminal law could come into play if an attorney used his powers to affect a criminal act.

In short there is in place a significant body of law designed to protect a vulnerable adult against an attorney acting improperly – clients can be reassured on that point.

However, the main consideration in choosing an attorney is the honesty and integrity of that person.  Powers granted to such a person can make families’ lives so much easier should incapacity strike.

Pensioners miss out in a nation digitally divided

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

New research shows there is a digital divide in Britain between pensioners and non-pensioners when it comes to bagging bargains online‚ and pensioners are missing out financially as a result.

Research from the Institute for Financial Studies commissioned by Age Concern and Help the Aged shows that non-pensioners increased their spending on communications technology at two and a half times the rate of pensioners in the past twelve years.

This comes on the back of new research from the Office for National Statistics revealing that more than 64% of people over 65 have never used the internet .

Pensioners who aren’t online are missing out on hundreds of pounds in potential savings by shopping around and can also often miss out on the best interest rates for savings accounts….

Read the full story at Age Concern